Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
New York
Houston
Stamford
Washington, D.C.
Almaty
Astana
Dubai
Frankfurt
Istanbul
London
Mexico City
Milan
Muscat
Paris

Firm Profile

Practice Areas

Attorneys

Offices

Recruiting

News

Publications
Newsletters
Articles

Search
Site Map
Contact Us
Home



Publications

Newsletters

International Report
 
September 1995

U.S. INCOME TAX TREATIES: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

By:
Eduardo A. Cukier
New York

On August 11, 1995, the U.S. Senate finally ratified six treaties and protocols for the avoidance of double taxation between the United States and Canada, Mexico, France, Ukraine, Portugal and Sweden. A pending treaty between the United States and Kazakhstan has not yet been sent to the Senate for ratification because certain bank secrecy issues remain to be settled.

The Senate's vote and ratification of these treaties and protocols was delayed since November 1994 due to certain objections by Senator Byron Dorgan. Senator Dorgan disagrees with the U.S. Treasury Department's interpretation of the provision in the treaties that governs the allocation of income among related parties resulting from transactions between such related parties.

The Treasury Department interprets this provision as preventing the United States from doing away with the "arm's length" approach and replacing it with a formulary apportionment approach. The "arm's length" approach allocates income among related parties by establishing transfer pricing among related parties that is comparable to pricing among unrelated parties. The formulary apportionment approach allocates income among related parties based on the relative weight of certain factors (e.g., payroll, property and sales).

In order to avoid further delays in ratification, the Treasury Department agreed to formally conduct a joint conference and study with the state governments the amount of U.S. tax revenues lost due to transfer pricing abuses by foreign entities doing business in the United States. The Treasury Department will also analyze the issues involved in implementing a federal formulary apportionment system.





 
 

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
Attorneys & Counsellors at Law


W3Counterpage counter
Firm Profile  |   Practice Areas  |   Attorneys  |   Offices  |   Recruiting  |   News  |   Publications  |   Search  |   Site Map  |   Contact Us  |   Home 
 



New York Newark Stamford Houston Washington, D.C. Mexico City London Paris Frankfurt Milan Muscat